Quality Control

Through defined, executable, and reviewable workflows,
we ensure that every delivered document maintains structural consistency, terminology accuracy, and linguistic precision.

Quality Control Principles

We treat translation as a structured and controllable process — not a one-step output.

Every project follows these core principles:

• Clearly defined service scope and quality tier
• Structured translation followed by layered review
• Terminology consistency within each document
• Deliverables that can be reviewed and verified

Workflow Structure

While the level of control varies across service tiers,
the underlying workflow structure remains consistent.

Standard

• Structured translation based on source text analysis
• Terminology consistency control
• Accuracy-focused review
• Pre-delivery verification

Professional & Expert

• Enhanced stylistic and structural alignment
• Domain terminology validation
• Coherence and readability optimization
• Multi-layer final review

Terminology Management

In technical, academic, and formal documentation,
terminology handling is a critical factor in quality stability.

Depending on project scope, terminology is managed through:

• Reference to client-provided materials
• Internal terminology consistency checks
• Alignment with established domain usage

Terminology management is embedded within the workflow — not treated as a separate add-on.

Reviewable Deliverables

All outputs are produced within a structured control framework.

This means:

• Each review stage has a defined purpose
• Linguistic adjustments follow documented logic
• Similar projects maintain consistent performance standards

All translations undergo internal review before delivery.

Scope Boundaries

To maintain clarity of responsibility,
the following are not included within standard quality control:

• Full-scale stylistic rewriting beyond agreed scope
• Creative or marketing copy optimization
• Substitution for subject-matter expert review

Relationship with Service Tiers

○ The depth of quality control corresponds to the selected service tier.
○ Differences between tiers lie in scope and level of control — not in whether the process is managed.
○ The workflow structure remains consistent; execution depth is adjusted according to project requirements.

ReptaWrite